Put neonics case to EU Chief Scientist urges CPA
CPA chief executive Nick von Westenholz said the Commission's decision to press ahead with a ban, without a political mandate from Member States and based on flaky scientific evidence, was directly at odds with President Barroso's commitment to put science-based decision-making at the heart of Europe's drive for innovation and economic growth.

"Professor Glover's appointment as the European Commission's first chief scientific adviser in January 2012 followed a pledge by Jose Manuel Barroso to fundamentally review how the EU accesses and uses scientific advice, particularly in areas of controversy or uncertainty."

"Her appointment was followed earlier this year by the creation of a new Science and Technology Advisory Council, a move intended to reflect the Commission's increasing focus on science and technology to boost European competitiveness.

"However, both Professor Glover and the new advisory council appear to have been absent from the decision-making process on neonicotinoids, " said Mr von Westenholz.

Mr von Westenholz said the Commission's decision to impose a ban ignored field-based research which found no evidence of harmful effects on bees when neonicotinoids are used under field conditions. Instead the Commission relied on studies which did not reproduce realistic exposure conditions or dose rates.

Last week, the UK's outgoing chief scientific adviser, Professor Sir John Beddington, told CPA's Annual Convention that the European Commission's ban on neonicotinoids did not reflect the scientific evidence and was a potential misuse of the precautionary principle.

"This decision calls into question the role of the EU's chief scientist and advisory council," continued Mr von Westenholz. "Failure to refer the Commission's decision to these independent advisers sets a potentially damaging precedent for EU decision-making, and sends a negative signal to research-based organisations across Europe."

"We believe that a ban on the use of neonicotinoid seed treatments would not improve bee health, but would remove a key crop protection technology which is vital for economically and environmentally sustainable crop production in the UK and across Europe."

"Extensive scientific and field-based monitoring and evidence from beekeepers point to the Varroa mite and parasitic diseases, combined with the problems associated with habitat loss, colony stress and climate change, as the key factors implicated in declining bee populations."

"The crop protection industry recognises the critical importance of bees as pollinators for agriculture and food production. It is vital that the causes of bee health problems are properly understood, and our industry actively supports ongoing research and stewardship programmes aimed at protecting bee health."

"Campaigns to blame the nearest chemical must not deflect research effort and resource away from these environmental, pest and disease issues which together present the major underlying challenges to bee health," he said.

As the European Commission prepares to formalise its decision to impose a temporary ban on the use of neonicotinoid insecticides later this week, the UK Crop Protection Association (CPA) is calling on the Commission to formally request and publish advice on the issue from the EU's chief scientific adviser Professor Anne Glover and the EU's new Science and Technology Advisory Council, prior to any final decision.

Share with
Media Enquiries
Adam Speed
Adam Speed
Head of Communications
01733 355375
07884 586400
adam.s@cropprotection.org.uk
Wendy Gray
Wendy Gray
Membership & Events Manager
01733 355374
07590 745695
wendy@cropprotection.org.uk